So I had a very interesting night last night. After work my good friend Iamba* came by and we had a great discussion regarding a story she wants to write with my help. She asked me for some ideas and the one I went with right off the bat is:
- In the near future we will have the understanding of what makes the human mind work, muscularly, biologically and functionally. We will be able to fix or repair brain damage, restoring functionality to those that have lost ability due to injury or illness. We will also be able to repair genetic damage that was caused at birth by applying these same techniques to eradicate retardation, Down's Syndrome and other mental deficiencies. Many feel it is ethically responsible for us to bring all of humanity up to a even playing field to allow all of us equal opportunity.
- But what if we understand what intelligence is and we can re-engineer all biological life such that we can grant human level intelligence to animals? Should we? Should humanity be the sole owners of intelligence? Should we uplift just chimpanzees? Should we uplift dogs, cats, pigs, cows, flies, anything?
- If we could talk with them, what would they say? How would they feel about not having an opposeable thumb and the inability to manipulate objects as finely as us? Would they want us to re-engineer them to be more like us so as to effect the world like we do? Or would they want something different?
- Would they want to be treated as equals and demand equal rights? Does that apply to just the uplifted animals and not the ones left behind? Should all animals be uplifted?
- What about the different factions of humans? One group feels that animals should be left alone; another says uplift them but engineer them to be willing slaves; another says they should have free will and manifest destiny; others say just add some intelligence, but not all the way, for WE should maintain our dominance.
- Would natural traits such as alpha instinct, pack mentality and predator/prey behavior be engineered out of them? Could they be? Would we be able to take this part of intelligence but not that part? If unable to weed out these behavioral instincts, how will they function in our civilized society? Would uplifted wolves still chase uplifted rabbits that run from everything? Or would the uplifted rabbits fight back with cunning and trickery?
- I feel the most interesting points will be to discover what these animals have to say. What does a whale sing about? Why does the Preying Mantis eat her mate after sex? Would the black widow spider share her knowledge of webspinning? Does my dog REALLY like me, or am I just a convenient food source, thus I shouldn't be pissed off. WHAT ARE THEY THINKING?
I hope to continue this project and get some feedback from Iamba as to what direction this will go.
We also waxed philosophical about talking politics with strangers. I really shouldn't! LOL. Without going into too much detail, I was sucked in to a morning commute conversation (I ride the Tri-Rail from Hollywood to Miami) with an acquaintance and she mentioned that I really don't talk much about politics. I mistakenly took that as a cue that she would be willing to have a nice discussion on various political views. I like differing views and like to discuss their pros and cons. Well, in short, she said something I understood to be, "The reason that Miami city government is so corrupt is," then in a very hushed tone and a furtive glance, "all the Cubans are used to getting around the system back on their island so they do it here." ...
I was shocked! I then asked if what I heard was correct. "Did I just hear you say that Cubans are to blame for the state of governmental corruption here?" She said, "Yes."
I then said, "I am not so sure I agree with the validity of that stereotypical statement. Do you happen to have evidence of the Cuban - corruption connection?" She began to get visibly upset. She said, "I didn't say that. I am not a stereotyper. I don't do that. That's not what I said!"
I then asked, "I'm sorry, but if that isn't what you said, what did you say? I just want to clarify that what I heard was correct."
She became more upset by the minute. Our stop came up and she bolted like I had just shot her. I followed, not understanding why she was practically running away. I caught up to her and said, "Have I upset you?" She repeated, "I am not a stereotyper or a racist!" and turned and walked away!" I attempted to apologize, but it fell on deaf ears.
On the bus ride to class later that night, I was replaying the event in my mind to see where I went wrong and have some questions:
- If someone says something in a hushed tone and furtive glances to see if anyone is listening, does that not mean they are aware that what they are about to say is possibly perceived to be controversial or not popular? Am I misinterpreting the body language here?
- Was my acquaintance angry at me for misunderstanding her statement, for calling her on it, or is she mad at herself for making the statement in the first place?
- Why do people want to discuss interesting controversial issues, but when they do, get upset and angry? I didn't feel angry at the woman for her view, I was just surprised she said it out loud. Why did she get angry? Why not discuss it rationally and evaluate the topic critically?
- I was dismayed to discover that our budding friendship was so fragile as to not handle even the slightest disagreement. I guess that it is better to have discovered this now before anything deeper had been created. I am just constantly amazed at the utter complexity of interpersonal relationships.
Iamba talked a little about this when I related the event to her. She said she tries to refrain from talking politics as most people are over emotional and not logical in their views. (I wonder why that is. Government should be dispassionate and reasonable.) She said that she will only discuss political theory, not working politics. I guess I will have to adopt that view to keep others from getting upset unnecessarily.
I thought I had said I wasn't going to go into detail...sigh...
*changed the names to protect the not so innocent...
Anyway, On to more positive topics like:
- Semantic Web takes big step forward - This is going to be as big a jump in use fullness as the web itself was.
- Self-Paced Brain-Computer Interface Gets Closer to Reality - I am waiting, impatiently, for my PC to just 'know' what I am thinking, just like my leg or arm does now. Keyboard? Mouse? Useless.
- Penn Engineers Create Carbon Nanopipettes That Are Smaller Than Cells and Measure Electric Current - This leads us to tiny repair tools that will slip into cells and repair DNA an organelles from the inside out, repairing age related damage and genetic abnormalities. Maybe even DNA restructuring. Also the possibility of inserting a nanopipette into neurons to monitor individual firing and create recordings of the resultant patterns in realtime. Fun stuff.
- Graphene quantum dot may solve some quantum computing problems - Could this be the next paradigm in computation, after the IC chip?
- Pushing The Limits Of Computer Chip Miniaturization - Another related article to computational paradigms. With further refinement and improvement, Moore's Law could go to 2020, but we should be well into the next substrate of computing before then. I do like how this article shows the Accelerating Returns that IC chips have followed. The next 20 years will have 1 million times more change than the last 20. WOOT!
- Food from cloned animals deemed safe in US - Why did it take over a year to determine if cloned animals are safe to eat? Muscle is muscle, regardless of how it is born...I'm confused here. And why are two thirds of consumers wary of cloned products? Same reason as for the reluctance to accept Genetically Modified foods? (They don't realize that most domesticated animals have been genetically modified for centuries. Its called selective breeding.) I guess they really don't know what it is, and thus are afraid of what they don't understand. Unfortunately change is accelerating and consumers will understand less and less, does that mean they will consume less and less? When everything is like magic, will they stop consuming altogether?
- Has AT&T Lost Its Mind?A baffling proposal to filter the Internet. - Nice way to destroy a company.
- MacBook ErrWhy I'm disappointed in Apple's ultraslim new laptop. - Smaller sizes. Greater capabilities. I am loving this day and age. Can't wait for the "PC in a pill"